Get Updates

State Freight Strategies Must Focus on Job Creation

By Admin

November 15, 2012

Mr. Jack Wells
Chief Economist
Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC  20590

RE: Interim Guidance on State Freight Plans and State Freight Advisory Committees
Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0168

Dear Mr. Wells:

On behalf of the Transportation Trades Department, AFL-CIO (TTD), I am writing to comment on the Department of Transportation’s (DOT or Department) Notice of Interim Guidance on State Freight Plans and State Freight Advisory Committees.  By way of background, TTD represents 31 affiliated unions representing workers in all modes of transportation, including those engaged in the movement of freight.[1]

TTD supports the Department’s efforts to implement sections 1117 and 1118 of MAP-21 by encouraging states to develop State Freight Advisory Committees and State Freight Plans.  We agree with the Department that freight transportation plays a vital role in our nation’s economic strength, and believe that better coordinated efforts can generate economic benefits.

While we are encouraged by DOT’s recommendations set forth in its interim guidance, we believe that states must specifically consider job creation and economic stimulus as they draft their freight strategies.  We recognize that enhanced freight transportation will lead to the creation and preservation of jobs, but we believe that the creation of jobs must be a focus when states develop their plans.  Toward this end, we support the addition of a twelfth recommendation – “Job Creation and Economic Stimulus” – specifically advocating that State Freight Plans proactively include strategies to create and preserve jobs and stimulate economic activity.  Additionally, the recommendation to include employee representatives on State Freight Advisory Committees will provide states with the support and input they need to achieve this important recommendation.

States will maximize their potential for success when they formulate their Freight Plans by identifying and utilizing all viable modes of freight transportation.  However, this has not always been the case.  Maritime transportation, a major component of freight transport, has regrettably been long ignored in federal and state freight policy.  Yet, our nation’s maritime system and ports employ thousands of workers, and provide a critical link in the movement of freight.

Investing in rail and ensuring it’s connected to ports and other hubs of commerce is important to successfully integrating a comprehensive freight network.  By carrying heavy and sizeable loads efficiently, rail provides another option for transporting freight across our country.  Continued improvements to intermodal infrastructure will enhance railroads’ ability to connect with the larger freight network, and will enhance the effectiveness of a comprehensive freight system.  Pursuing a multimodal approach will help create an environment conducive to establishing new routes to connect underserved regions, provide flexibility and greater shipping options for businesses, generate economic stimulus, and create jobs.

State Freight Advisory Committees and State Freight Plans, properly focused as suggested in our comments, can play an important role in ensuring that our national freight network efficiently integrates all sectors of our national transportation network.  TTD appreciates the Department’s efforts to provide states with guidance on developing their Freight Plans and Freight Advisory Committees, and we hope you will take our comments into consideration.


Edward Wytkind